[QUOTE=DarkUSS;96096]
Mercedes, BMW "" , "" .
, .
, .
, . "" "" "" .
. , , "" ( ? ...).[/QUOTE]
BMW "" ( ) .. .. ?? ? ...
.. :tiphat:
2 quotes " ..." . " , . ". . !. . . . .
, . ) ( . ) . - . / . .
( ). Chekenout .
1)
2)North Pole May Be Ice-Free for First Time This Summer (National Geographic)
Scientists are particularly interested in the North and South Poles because they are expected to show the most dramatic effects of global warming.
Models predict that the regions will see temperature increases roughly three times as quickly as the rest of the globe because of an effect known as ice albedo feedback, which occurs when highly reflective ice gives way to dark water.
The water absorbs much more of the sun's energy, increasing temperatures and causing further ice melting. "We lost 65 percent of the ice cover in the Northern Hemisphere all in one year," Barber said. "So it was a whopping decrease. We didn't even think it was possible for the system to lose so much ice all at once."
...
3) ( 1 31 ), "" 31 23.55. "5 " 90% 50% (.. ) 90% 2030
Greekteo Valkyre . " ..." . , ..
p.s. Valkyre ?
, . ( ; ( 3 , ; ; ; !)
, ...
1860 , 0.5 ... ...
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ut_030320.html
! !!! pathfinder? ;
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-warming.html
15 global warming global winter '60, ...
http://www.denverpost.com/harsanyi/ci_3899807
"Plenty of young people tell me they don't believe it," he says. "But they won't touch this at all. If they're smart, they'll say: 'I'm going to let this run its course.' It's a sort of mild McCarthyism. I just believe in telling the truth the best I can. I was brought up that way."
So next time you're with some progressive friends, dissent. Tell 'em you're not sold on this global warming stuff.
Back away slowly. You'll probably be called a fascist.
Don't worry, you're not. A true fascist is anyone who wants to take away my air conditioning or force me to ride a bike.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/m.../09/do0907.xml
There IS a problem with global warming... it stopped in 1998
By Bob Carter
Last Updated: 12:01am BST 09/04/2006
For many years now, human-caused climate change has been viewed as a large and urgent problem. In truth, however, the biggest part of the problem is neither environmental nor scientific, but a self-created political fiasco. Consider the simple fact, drawn from the official temperature records of the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia, that for the years 1998-2005 global average temperature did not increase (there was actually a slight decrease, though not at a rate that differs significantly from zero).
...Marketed under the imprimatur of the IPCC, the bladder-trembling and now infamous hockey-stick diagram that shows accelerating warming during the 20th century - a statistical construct by scientist Michael Mann and co-workers from mostly tree ring records - has been a seminal image of the climate scaremongering campaign. Thanks to the work of a Canadian statistician, Stephen McIntyre, and others, this graph is now known to be deeply flawed.
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597
Alpine glaciers have been retreating since the early 19th century, and were advancing for several centuries before that. Since about 1970, many of the glaciers have stopped retreating and some are now advancing again. And, frankly, we don't know why.
2 nonborn
... ... ...
Valkyre
?
, ..... , .
http://teenagepundit.blogspot.com/20...ng-is-bad.html
http://www.lockjawslair.com/archives...recycling.html
http://www.deanesmay.com/posts/1122480118.shtml
This is a pet topic of mine. As an engineer it is something I have to deal with professionally. And as an efficiency freak, it's just near and dear to my heart.
There are really only 2 consumer products that make much sense to recycle today: aluminum and cardboard. And cardboard just barely makes the list.
The "recycling paper saves trees" concept is true on its surface, but not in any meaningful way. Almost all trees used in paper manufacture are farm raised specifically for that purpose (pulp wood). The tiny percentage that aren't farm raised are basically "scrap" trees that are cut for some other purpose, but have no other economic use. The supply of pulp wood trees is still growing, and there is no chance of us running out. It only takes 10-15 years to start getting a useable crop.
On top of that, the actual process of converting paper back into a useable form is not only energy intensive, but is a very nasty chemical process too, with potential environmental headaches.
, ...
Bookmarks